Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 722 F.2d 1206 - McGee v. Wj Estelle

McGee v. Wj Estelle’s Empirical Analysis

722 F.2d 1206 · 1984

Citation profile

121
cited by 121 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
October 2014
most recently cited

69 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 121 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 2014 · most notably Granberry v. Greer (1987), United States of America v. Rosalinda Miranda Abel Espinoza Rigoberto Rodriguez Oscar Rodriguez Hector Espinoza (2001)

69 federal appellate · 2 district ·

7501984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Johnson v. Zerbst · Younger v. Harris · Wainwright v. Sykes · Fay v. Noia · Rose v. Lundy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 121 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]e have repeatedly refused to examine issues not raised in the appellate briefs absent the possibility of injustice so grave as to warrant disregard of the usual procedural rules,”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “'as chief legal officer of the state, the attorney general is the appropriate person to assert, or to waive, the state's right first to determine [a habeas corpus claim].'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “federalism, expense to litigants and the conservation of judicial resources are all served by honoring the waiver and deciding the case on the merits.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.