Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 722 F.2d 343 - United States v. Baker

United States v. Baker’s Empirical Analysis

722 F.2d 343 · 1983

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
5
states following
October 2008
most recently cited

18 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently October 2008 · most notably United States v. Foppe (1993), United States v. DiCaro (1985)

18 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

140198319902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 18 U.S.C. § 641 (Livestock Fraud Protection Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 656

Relies on California v. Green · Patterson v. United States · Romano v. United States · Texas v. Louisiana · Nogueras v. Puerto Rico International Airlines, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “that because [the witness] was willing to testify to the facts underlying her earlier out-of-court statement, the jury had a satisfactory basis for evaluating that statement, and the confrontation clause was not violated.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “We express no view on whether [the witness's] prior statement would have been admissible had her memory lapse been more complete or more believable.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the jury's ability to determine the veracity of the out-of-court statement,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.