Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 722 F.2d 464 - Stone v. Heckler

Stone v. Heckler’s Empirical Analysis

722 F.2d 464 · 1983

Citation profile

80
cited by 80 later decisions
1
states following
March 2011
most recently cited

47 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 80 later decisions — most recently March 2011 · most notably Gallant v. Heckler (1984), Occidental Petroleum Corporation v. Securities and Exchange Commission (1989)

47 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

4501983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1292 · 42 U.S.C. § 423 (§ 223 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp. · Richardson v. Perales · Eisen v. Carlisle & Jacquelin · Heckler v. Campbell · Gillespie v. United States Steel Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 80 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “will promote the least possible waste of judicial resources.”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Forney v. Chater · Wen-Wan Chang Tsung-Ming Chang Chiao-Ying Chang Yi Yuan Chiang Hsien-Ming Hsieh Shu-Chuan Hsieh Pei-Chen Hsieh Sung Duck Kong Hye Ra Kong Hyun Jung Kong Min Suk Kong Yei-Chien Lai Yu Kuei Lai Yen Chih Lai Chen Ju Lai Yoon Sik Lee Jong Hee Lee Eung Jun Lee Sang Eun Lee Eung Sang Lee Cheng-Hsiung She Hui Wen She Tzu Ming She Alabama Almark, Lp Alabama Bailey Lp Alabama Coosa Lp Alabama Dallas Lp Alabama Denim Lp Alabama Millry Lp Alabama Pro Sports Lp Alabama Rive Run Lp C & W Hotel Lp Delaware Milford Lp Georgia Almark Lp Louisiana Lasevilla Lp Mississippi Bass Lp Mississippi Magee Lp Mississippi McT Lp Mississippi Neely Lp, Maryland Limited Partnerships Mississippi Tees Lp, a Mississippi Limited Partnership National Steak Restaurants Lp North Carolina K-Barb Lp North Carolina Russell-Harvelle Hosiery Lp Pennsylvania Loungewear Lp Recap Fund I Lp Recap Fund v. Lp Rpc Fund I Lp South Carolina Manufacturing Lp Tennessee Lafayette Lp Wtc Fund I Lp United States Export Fund I Lp, Maryland Limited Partnerships v. United States of America, Wen-Wan Chang Tsung-Ming Chang Chiao-Ying Chang Yi Yuan Chiang Hsien-Ming Hsieh Shu-Chuan Hsieh Pei-Chen Hsieh Sung Duck Kong Hye Ra Kong Hyun Jung Kong Min Suk Kong Yei-Chien Lai Yu Kuei Lai Yen Chih Lai Chen Ju Lai Yoon Sik Lee Jong Hee Lee Eung Jun Lee Sang Eun Lee Eung Sang Lee Cheng-Hsiung She Hui Wen She Tzu Ming She Alabama Almark, Lp Alabama Bailey Lp Alabama Coosa Lp Alabama Dallas Lp Alabama Denim Lp Alabama Millry Lp Alabama Pro Sports Lp Alabama Rive Run Lp C & W Hotel Lp Delaware Milford Lp Georgia Almark Lp Louisiana Lasevilla Lp Mississippi Bass Lp Mississippi Magee Lp Mississippi McT Lp Mississippi Neely Lp, Maryland Limited Partnerships Mississippi Tees Lp, a Mississippi Limited Partnership National Steak Restaurants Lp North Carolina K-Barb Lp North Carolina Russell-Harvelle Hosiery Lp Pennsylvania Loungewear Lp Recap Fund I Lp Recap Fund v. L Rpc Fund I Lp South Carolina Manufacturing Lp Tennessee Lafayette Lp Wtc Fund I Lp United States Export Fund I Lp, Maryland Limited Partnerships v. United States
  2. “practical rather than a technical construction,”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Wen-Wan Chang Tsung-Ming Chang Chiao-Ying Chang Yi Yuan Chiang Hsien-Ming Hsieh Shu-Chuan Hsieh Pei-Chen Hsieh Sung Duck Kong Hye Ra Kong Hyun Jung Kong Min Suk Kong Yei-Chien Lai Yu Kuei Lai Yen Chih Lai Chen Ju Lai Yoon Sik Lee Jong Hee Lee Eung Jun Lee Sang Eun Lee Eung Sang Lee Cheng-Hsiung She Hui Wen She Tzu Ming She Alabama Almark, Lp Alabama Bailey Lp Alabama Coosa Lp Alabama Dallas Lp Alabama Denim Lp Alabama Millry Lp Alabama Pro Sports Lp Alabama Rive Run Lp C & W Hotel Lp Delaware Milford Lp Georgia Almark Lp Louisiana Lasevilla Lp Mississippi Bass Lp Mississippi Magee Lp Mississippi McT Lp Mississippi Neely Lp, Maryland Limited Partnerships Mississippi Tees Lp, a Mississippi Limited Partnership National Steak Restaurants Lp North Carolina K-Barb Lp North Carolina Russell-Harvelle Hosiery Lp Pennsylvania Loungewear Lp Recap Fund I Lp Recap Fund v. Lp Rpc Fund I Lp South Carolina Manufacturing Lp Tennessee Lafayette Lp Wtc Fund I Lp United States Export Fund I Lp, Maryland Limited Partnerships v. United States of America, Wen-Wan Chang Tsung-Ming Chang Chiao-Ying Chang Yi Yuan Chiang Hsien-Ming Hsieh Shu-Chuan Hsieh Pei-Chen Hsieh Sung Duck Kong Hye Ra Kong Hyun Jung Kong Min Suk Kong Yei-Chien Lai Yu Kuei Lai Yen Chih Lai Chen Ju Lai Yoon Sik Lee Jong Hee Lee Eung Jun Lee Sang Eun Lee Eung Sang Lee Cheng-Hsiung She Hui Wen She Tzu Ming She Alabama Almark, Lp Alabama Bailey Lp Alabama Coosa Lp Alabama Dallas Lp Alabama Denim Lp Alabama Millry Lp Alabama Pro Sports Lp Alabama Rive Run Lp C & W Hotel Lp Delaware Milford Lp Georgia Almark Lp Louisiana Lasevilla Lp Mississippi Bass Lp Mississippi Magee Lp Mississippi McT Lp Mississippi Neely Lp, Maryland Limited Partnerships Mississippi Tees Lp, a Mississippi Limited Partnership National Steak Restaurants Lp North Carolina K-Barb Lp North Carolina Russell-Harvelle Hosiery Lp Pennsylvania Loungewear Lp Recap Fund I Lp Recap Fund v. L Rpc Fund I Lp South Carolina Manufacturing Lp Tennessee Lafayette Lp Wtc Fund I Lp United States Export Fund I Lp, Maryland Limited Partnerships v. United States · Regents of University v. Heckler
  3. “especially considered whether a holding of nonappealability would effectively deprive the litigants of an opportunity to obtain review.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.