Turner v. Orr’s Empirical Analysis
722 F.2d 661 · 1984
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Hitt v. Nissan Motor Co. · 383 F. Supp. 699 - Hart v. Community Sch. Bd. of Brooklyn, NY Sch. D. 21 · Duryea v. Third Northwestern National Bank · United States v. City of Parma · Iten Leasing Co. v. Burroughs Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“JUDGMENT ENFORCEMENT PROCEDURES The Plaintiffs’ Monitoring Committee is authorized to present matters through counsel of its choice in connection with carrying out this Judgment to the Special Master and the Court..... 4. All class members wishing to present complaints of Judgment violation shall contact the Plaintiffs’ Monitoring Committee. ---- If the Committee in consultation with counsel, is of the opinion that the complaint merits presentation before the Special Master, the complaint shall be presented to the Special Master. The Special Master shall have plenary authority to determine the procedures to be used in resolving such complaints by the class members. In the event that the Special Master determines that a violation of the Judgment has occurred, he shall be authorized to order all appropriate relief therefor, including the award of costs and attorney fees. The parties shall have the right to appeal any such decisions to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida, and all other rights of appeal are preserved.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Turner v. Orr“appointed pursuant to a consent judgment between the parties to a Title VII discrimination case was in essence an arbitrator whose decisions were intended to be final and to bind the parties was clearly erroneous. Examining the record, the court held that the”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“is fairly technical, and appears specifically in Rule 53. Therefore, it is logical to assume that, absent an explicit indication to the contrary, when the parties provided for a”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.