Pettinelli v. Danzig’s Empirical Analysis
722 F.2d 706 · 1984
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 2 district · 9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 49 later decisions — most recently March 2017 · most notably Green Leaf Nursery v. Ei Dupont De Nemours and Company (2003), T.D.S. Incorporated v. Shelby Mutual Insurance Company (1985)
10 federal appellate · 2 district · 9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co. · Cyril M. HUDAK, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ECONOMIC RESEARCH ANALYSTS, INC., and Richard W. McIntyre, Defendants-Appellants · Columbus Hotel Corp. v. Hotel Management Co. · Cameron v. Outdoor Resorts of America, Inc. · Cavic v. Grand Bahama Development Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 49 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“failed to make a prima facie case of fraud because they had no legal right to rely on any representations under these circumstances.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]he parties were both represented by counsel and specifically advised not to rely on any representations.... From the beginning of the negotiations it was clear that the parties were in an adversarial relationship.... Throughout this negotiation, appellants knew from their own dealings that they should not rely on any representations made by the defendants.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“1)the defendant made a false representation of past or present fact, 2)the defendant knew the statement was false, 3)the statement was made for the purpose of inducing the plaintiff to rely on it, and 4)the plaintiff's reliance was reasonable.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Mergens v. Dreyfoos
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.