Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 722 F.2d 723 - United States v. Hayes

United States v. Hayes’s Empirical Analysis

722 F.2d 723 · 1984

Citation profile

67
cited by 67 later decisions
3
states following
November 2017
most recently cited

33 federal appellate · 2 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 67 later decisions — most recently November 2017 · most notably Liming v. Damos (2012), Combs v. Ryan's Coal Co. (1986)

33 federal appellate · 2 district · 4 state decisions

3601984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 7604 · 26 U.S.C. § 7609 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291

Relies on Bonner v. City of Prichard · United States v. Ryan · Maggio v. Zeitz · United States v. Rylander · Northside Realty Associates, Inc. v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 67 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “To succeed on this defense, however, the respondent must go beyond a mere assertion of inability and satisfy his burden of production on the point by introducing evidence in support of his claim.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “in good faith all reasonable efforts to comply.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “"Even if the efforts he did make were 'substantial,' 'diligent' or 'in good faith,' . . . the fact that he did not make 'all reasonable efforts' establishes that [respondent] did not sufficiently rebut the . . . prima facie showing of contempt."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.