Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 722 F.2d 853 - Nellis v. Brown County

Nellis v. Brown County’s Empirical Analysis

722 F.2d 853 · 1983

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
January 2016
most recently cited

19 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently January 2016 · most notably Patkus v. Sangamon-Cass Consortium (1985), Piper Aircraft Corp. v. Wag-Aero, Inc. (1984)

19 federal appellate · 1 district ·

2801983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 703 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)

Relies on McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · Texas Department of Community Affairs v. Burdine · United States v. United States Gypsum Co. · United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. Aikens · Pullman-Standard v. Swint

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In reviewing an action for discrimination under Title VII ... the general rule is that 'we are bound under Fed.R.Civ.P. 52(a) to accept [the district court's] findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the plaintiff must then have an opportunity to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the legitimate reasons offered by the defendant were not its true reasons, but were a pretext for discrimination.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[w]here the defendant has done everything that would be required of him if the plaintiff had properly made out a prima facie case, whether the plaintiff really did so is no longer relevant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.