Ming Chen v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis
722 F.3d 63 · 2013
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (§ 237 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Kucana v. Holder · Wei Guang Wang v. Board of Immigration Appeals · Nikijuluw v. Gonzales · Khan v. Attorney General of United States · Larngar v. Holder
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Under the case law, a change typically will be categorized as a change in personal circumstances, as opposed to a change in country circumstances, if the change is self-induced. . . . This prevents aliens from repeatedly reopening their removal proceedings based on changes that are within their control.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Lin v. Barr
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.