10 Ring Precision, Inc. v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis
722 F.3d 711 · 2013
Citation profile
6 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 923 · 18 U.S.C. § 926 · 5 U.S.C. § 552A (§ 3 of the Privacy Act of 1974) · 5 U.S.C. § 706
Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association of United States Inc v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company Consumer Alert · Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United States · Ratzlaf et Ux United States · Colautti v. Franklin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Each licensee shall, when required by letter issued by the Attorney General, and until notified to the contrary in writing by the Attorney General, submit on a form specified by the Attorney General, for periods and at the times specified in such letter, all record information required to be kept by this chapter [Chapter 44 of Title 18 of the United States Code] or such lesser record information as the Attorney General in such letter may specify.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Although the [July 2011] demand letter was sent to more FFLs than the demand letters at issue in prior cases, it seeks only to obtain a narrow subset of information relating to a specific set of transactions — the sale of two or more rifles of a specific type to the same person in a five day period — from a specific set of FFLs — FFLs in four border states who are licensed dealers and pawnbrokers.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“We will uphold an agency’s action ‘if its reasons and policy choices satisfy minimum standards of rationality.’ ” (quoting Medina Cnty. Envtl. Action Ass’n v. Surface Transp. Bd., 602 F.3d 687, 699 (5th Cir.2010))). 16 . Alaska Dep't of Envtl. Conservation v. EPA, 540 U.S. 461, 497 , 124 S.Ct. 983 , 157 L.Ed.2d 967 (2004) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.