Porter v. Quarantillo’s Empirical Analysis
722 F.3d 94 · 2013
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2201 · 8 U.S.C. § 1409 (§ 309 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1503 (§ 360 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Idaho v. Wright · Tome v. United States · Sims v. Blot · Raskin v. Wyatt Co. · United States v. Coplan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'Only admissible evidence need be considered by the trial court in ruling on a motion for summary judgment,' and a 'district court deciding a summary judgment motion has broad discretion in choosing whether to admit evidence.'”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.