722 F. Supp. 1479 - Colunga v. Young’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently May 2011
6 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 26 U.S.C. § 3101 (Federal Insurance Contributions Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1915 · 28 U.S.C. § 1920 · 28 U.S.C. § 2201 · 29 U.S.C. § 1801 (Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (Taft-Hartley Act)) · 29 U.S.C. § 1802 (Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (Taft-Hartley Act)) · 29 U.S.C. § 1822 (Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (Taft-Hartley Act)) · 29 U.S.C. § 1854 (Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (Taft-Hartley Act))
Relies on Glasser v. United States · Delaware v. New York · Hallstrom v. Tillamook County · First National Bank v. United States · WCLR Radio Station v. Rengers
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“they were engaged in the handling of horticultural commodities”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.