722 F. Supp. 2d 617 - Gee v. Kerestes’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 636
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Jackson v. Virginia · Slack v. McDaniel · Williams v. Taylor · Brecht v. Abrahamson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The state and federal tests for prosecutorial misconduct claims are substantively identical .... Both focus on the fundamental fairness of the trial based on potential prejudice from the alleged prosecutorial misconduct”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Sneed v. Beard
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.