Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

722 N.W.2d 927

Skelley v. Lucent Technologies

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 25, 2006

Supreme Court of Minnesota · decided 2006-10-25

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently May 2007

1 state decisions

Relies on Hoff v. Kempton

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2006-10-25

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1*928 ORDER

¶2 Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

¶3 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed June 27, 2006, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (explaining that, [s]ummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

¶4 Employee is awarded $1,200 in attorney fees.

¶5 BY THE COURT:

/s/ Russell A. Anderson Chief Justice
/722/nw2d/927 · .json · Public domain