Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

722 So. 2d 286

Huey v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 31, 1998

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1998-12-31

Relies on 577 So. 2d 939 - State v. McCloud · 698 So. 2d 252 - Paccione v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1998-12-31

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently November 2011

4 state decisions

20199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1There is no double jeopardy violation when a defendant is convicted of the crime of delivery of a controlled substance and possession with intent to sell the same substance, because each crime contains an element that the other does not. Sec. 775.021(4)(a), Fla. Stat. (1997); State v. McCloud, 577 So.2d 939 (Fla.1991). Cf. Paccione v. State, 698 So.2d 252 (Fla.1997).

¶2AFFIRMED.

GRIFFIN, C.J., ANTOON, J., and ORFINGER, M., Senior Judge, concur.
/722/so2d/286 · .json · Public domain