Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 722 So. 2d 731 - White v. White

722 So. 2d 731 - White v. White’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
September 2015
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 639 So. 2d 921 - Ferguson v. Ferguson · 650 So. 2d 1281 - Johnson v. Johnson · Brabham v. Brabham · 437 So. 2d 410 - Tedford v. Dempsey · 609 So. 2d 1277 - Dunn v. Dunn

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Determine gross income from all potential sources that may reasonably be expected to be available to the absent parent including, but not limited to, the following: wages and salary income; income from self-employment; income from commissions; income from investments,-including dividends, interest income!,] and income on any trust account or property; absent parent’s portion of any joint income of both parents; workers’ compensation, disability, unemployment, annuity and retirement benefits, including an Individual Retirement Account (IRA); any other payments made by any person, private entity, federal or state government or any unit of local government; alimony; any income earned from an interest in or from inherited property; any other form of earned income; and gross income shall exclude any monetary benefits derived from a second household, such as income of the absent parent’s current spouse[.]”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “a chancellor's deviation from the Mississippi child support guidelines must be supported by an on the record finding that said deviation is warranted.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.