722 So. 2d 795 - Duncan v. State.’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
March 2004
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Brady v. United States · Mabry v. Johnson · Mabry v. Johnson · 598 So. 2d 895 - Ex Parte Jackson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Rule 32.9(d), Ala. R.Crim. P., states that the circuit court must make specific findings of fact relating to each material issue of fact presented for the court’s review in determining the merits of a Rule 32 petition. These findings of fact, which form the basis for the trial court’s denial of a petitioner’s Rule 32 petition, are necessary to afford the petitioner due process. Rule 32.9(d); Henderson v. State, 570 So.2d 879 (Ala.Cr.App.1990).””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Griffin v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.