722 So. 2d 924 - Nickell v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently October 2016
1 federal appellate · 8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 386 So. 2d 525 - Shriner v. State · Tausinger v. Woodlawn Park Associates · 626 So. 2d 1004 - Stanley v. State · 385 So. 2d 735 - Sanders v. State · 520 So. 2d 292 - Matire v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“An officer has probable cause to. arrest a suspect when there are reasonable grounds to believe the suspect has committed a felony. The facts from which probable cause arises do not need to meet the standard for conclusiveness and probability required of 'facts on which a conviction is based. However, probable cause does not arise when conduct is equally consistent with activity that is not criminal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“although that conduct was consistent with an intent to enter the laundry room and commit an offense inside, it was equally consistent with a simple act of vandalism ....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.