¶1Charles Michael Werts, Raiford, Pro Se.
¶2No Appearance For Appellee.
¶3PER CURIAM.
¶4We affirm the lower court's denial of the most recent Rule 3.800(a) attack on Charles Michael Werts' sentence. This is the fifth Rule 3.800(a) motion, and the ninth appeal to this court concerning his convictions and sentences in Case No. CR84-4432. Enough is enough. The defendant is prohibited from filing any further pro se pleadings with this court concerning his convictions and sentences in Case No. CR84-4432. As this court did in Davis v. State, 705 So.2d 133 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998); Bradley v. State, 703 So.2d 1176 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997); Rooney v. State, 699 So.2d 1027 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997); and O'Brien v. State, 689 So.2d 336 (Fla. 5th DCA), rev. denied, 697 So.2d 511 (Fla.1997), defendant is warned of the consequences of persisting.
¶5AFFIRMED.
¶6COBB, GOSHORN and PETERSON, JJ., concur.