Fee v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
April 1995
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 227th Judicial District Court)
Relationships
Relies on Almanza v. State · Carlsen v. State · Adams v. State · Standley v. State · Burrell v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Pee was alleged in the indictment to have conspired to commit and to have committed theft in combination with six other persons. The State has satisfied the requirements of the organized crime statute by proving that Fee and at least four other persons collaborated in carrying on the criminal activity. TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 71.01(A)(2).” 2”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Fee v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.