Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 722 SW2D 707 - Ex Parte Daniels

Ex Parte Daniels’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
1
states following
October 2018
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently October 2018

2 federal appellate · 17 state decisions

801987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co. · Shillitani v. United States · Cooke v. United States · Taylor v. Hayes · Terry

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"[t]o preserve order in the courtroom for the proper conduct of business, the court must act instantly to suppress disturbance or violence or physical obstruction or disrespect to the court, when occurring in open court. There is no need of evidence or assistance of counsel before punishment because the court has seen the offense. Such summary vindication of the court’s dignity and authority is necessary. It has always been so in the courts of the common law, and the punishment imposed is due process of law_” 267 U.S. at 534 , 45 S.Ct. at 394 . See generally Texas Government Code, Section 21.002(a)(b) and (c). Cf., Texas Government Code, Section 21.002(d) ("An officer of a court who is held in contempt by a trial court shall, on proper motion filed in the offended court, be released on his own personal recognizance pending a determination of his guilt or innocence by a judge of a district court that is not the offended court....”)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Commutation for good conduct; forfeiture of commutation; record 18 "In order to encourage county jail discipline, a distinction may be made in the terms of prisoners so as to extend to all such as are orderly, industrious and obedient, comforts and privileges according to their deserts; the reward to be bestowed on prisoners for good conduct shall consist of such relaxation of strict county jail rules, and extension of social privileges as may be consistent with proper discipline. Commutation of time for good conduct, industry and obedience may be granted the inmates of each county jail by the sheriff in charge.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “recessed.” If the court had recessed just after applicant had taken a picture of the judge, it was not engaged in business when the”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.