Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 722 SW2D 778 - Cruse v. State

Cruse v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
October 1999
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Carlsen v. State · Houston v. State · Wilson v. State · Chambers v. State · Cordova v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Here, the indictment alleges the methamphetamine to be of more than 28 grams. It does not use the phrase “including its adulterants and dilutants”. The state is bound by the allegations in its indictment and must prove them beyond a reasonable doubt.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.