Brown v. Rosenberger’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

1 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “§ 1720. Subrogation In actions arising out of the maintenance or use of a motor vehicle, there shall be no right of subrogation or reimbursement from a claimant’s tort recovery with respect to workers’ compensation benefits, benefits available under section 1711 (relating to required benefits), 1712 (relating to availability of benefits) or 1715 (relating to availability of adequate limits) or benefits paid or payable by a program, group contract or other arrangement whether primary or excess under section 1719 (relating to coordination of benefits).”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. City of Wilkes-Barre v. Sheils (In Re Cole) · Oliver v. City of Pittsburgh

2. “[A]s a matter of law, the plaintiff may plead, prove and recover those amounts paid to her through the Heart and Lung Act, as well as those amounts paid by the workers’ compensation carrier. The Heart and Lung Act provider and the workers’ compensation carrier shall have the right of subrogation to any third-party tort-feasor.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. City of Wilkes-Barre v. Sheils

3. “insofar as they relate to workers' compensation payments or other benefits under the Workers' Compensation Act.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Oliver v. City of Pittsburgh