Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 723 F.2d 175 - Levesque v. Block

Levesque v. Block’s Empirical Analysis

723 F.2d 175 · 1983

Citation profile

80
cited by 80 later decisions
3
states following
February 2024
most recently cited

45 federal appellate · 10 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 80 later decisions — most recently February 2024 · most notably 38 Cal. 3d 913 - Perdue v. Crocker National Bank (1985), Methodist Hospital v. Shalala (1994)

45 federal appellate · 10 district · 3 state decisions

26019831990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 5 U.S.C. § 553 (Administrative Procedure Act of 1946) · 5 U.S.C. § 706 · 7 U.S.C. § 2012 · 7 U.S.C. § 2013 · 7 U.S.C. § 2014

Relies on Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe · Skidmore v. Swift & Co. · Securities and Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corporation · General Electric Co. v. Gilbert · Batterton v. Francis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 80 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[w]e agree that substantial impact does not make a rule legislative, but whether a rule has a substantial impact may be relevant in construing the intent of the agency in issuing the rule.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “requires that public rule-making procedures shall not prevent an agency from operating.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “both follow section 553 and execute its statutory duties.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.