Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 723 F.2d 631 - Allison v. Block

Allison v. Block’s Empirical Analysis

723 F.2d 631 · 1983

Citation profile

75
cited by 75 later decisions
1
states following
October 2003
most recently cited

49 federal appellate · 11 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 75 later decisions — most recently October 2003 · most notably Williamson v. United States Department of Agriculture (1987), Johnson v. United States Department of Agriculture (1984)

49 federal appellate · 11 district · 1 state decisions

600198319902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1475 · 7 U.S.C. § 1921 (Agricultural Credit Act of 1978) · 7 U.S.C. § 1981A

Relies on Morton v. Ruiz · American Paper Institute, Inc. v. American Electric Power Service Corp. · Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. Ruckelshaus · State Highway Commission of Missouri v. Volpe · Gens v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 75 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]n addition to any other authority that the Secretary may have,”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the existence of some substantive standards,”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Congress intended the Secretary to give notice of the availability of § 1981a relief to all CFRDA borrowers subject to loan acceleration or foreclosure and to establish a uniform procedure under which the borrowers can make a requisite request and prima facie showing____ The requirement of the showing of prima facie eligibility is necessarily premised upon theexpectation that some procedure will be provided under which the borrower may make the requisite showing. Thus, the rudimentary elements of adequate notice and an opportunity to be heard are embodied in the language of § 1981a.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.