Lecky v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis
723 F.3d 1 · 2013
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 16 · 18 U.S.C. § 924 · 28 U.S.C. § 1738 · 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (§ 237 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1229B (§ 240a of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · North Carolina v. Alford · Taylor v. United States · Abimbola v. Ashcroft · Ming Lam Sui v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a taking of property . . . whenever there is criminal intent to deprive the owner of the rights and benefits of ownership, even if such deprivation is less than total or permanent.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Da Graca v. Garland“[n]ot all takings of property . . . will meet this standard because some takings entail a de minimis deprivation of ownership interests.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Da Graca v. Garland“albeit with deference accorded to the [Board's] reasonable interpretation of statutes and regulations falling within its bailiwick.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Da Graca v. Garland
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.