Jutus v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis
723 F.3d 105 · 2013
Citation profile
14 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (§ 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Abudu · Guo v. Ashcroft · Nikijuluw v. Gonzales · Lopez de Hincapie v. Gonzales · Raza v. Gonzales
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“introduce new, material evidence that was not available at the original merits hearing.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[T]he BIA enjoys considerable latitude in deciding whether to grant or deny [motions to reopen] ... and we review the BIA's denial of a motion to reopen only for abuse of discretion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Wanjiku v. Barr“The BIA enjoys considerable latitude in deciding whether to grant or deny motions to reopen ... and we review the BIA's denial of a motion to reopen only for abuse of discretion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Twum v. Barr
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.