Taylor v. Huerta’s Empirical Analysis
723 F.3d 210 · 2013
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 49 U.S.C. § 44709 · 5 U.S.C. § 706
Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Mathews v. Eldridge · Auer v. Robbins · Martin v. Occupational Safety & Health Review Commission · Mark v. Borough of Hatboro
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Our review of the NTSB order is limited to determining whether the Board's decision is 'arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.