Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 723 F.3d 434 - Waldburger v. CTS Corp.

Waldburger v. CTS Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

723 F.3d 434 · 2013

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
March 2016
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Appellate journey

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 9651 (§ 301 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980) · 42 U.S.C. § 9658 (§ 309 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980)

Relies on Robinson v. Shell Oil Co. · United States v. Kubrick · Medtronic, Inc. v. Lohr · Urie v. Thompson · Watt v. Alaska

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Except as provided in paragraph (1), the statute of limitations established under State law shall apply in all actions brought under State law for personal injury, or property damages, which are caused or contributed to by exposure to any hazardous substance, or pollutant or contaminant, released into the environment from a facility. . . . . .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “if the preemptive effect of § 9658 were susceptible to two interpretations, a presumption against preemption would counsel that we should limit § 9658's preemptive reach to statutes of limitations without also extending it to statutes of repose.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “bar[s] any suit that is brought after a specified time since the defendant acted (such as by designing or manufacturing a product), even if this period ends before the plaintiff has suffered a resulting injury.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.