Hernandez-Cuevas v. Taylor’s Empirical Analysis
723 F.3d 91 · 2013
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 31 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · Franks v. Delaware · Heck v. Humphrey
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the defendant (1) caused (2) a seizure of the plaintiff pursuant to legal process unsupported by probable cause, and (3) criminal proceedings terminated in plaintiff's favor.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“Certainly, in most eases, the neutral magistrate’s determination that probable cause exists for the individual’s arrest is an intervening act that could disrupt any argument that the defendant officer had caused the continued unlawful seizure.... But, if a plaintiff can overcome this causation problem and demonstrate that law enforcement officers were responsible for his continued, unreasonable pretrial detention, the plaintiff has stated a constitutional injury that may be vindicated through a § 1983 action.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“[ajlthough the complaint does not specify how the co-conspirators tainted the photo array, Hernandez-Cuevas has pled sufficient facts to support a reasonable inference that something was amiss. Specifically, Hernandez-Cuevas has alleged that rather than selecting a photograph of someone matching the description of [the courier] — short, stocky, and nearly sixty — [the informant] picked a photograph of Hernandez-Cuevas, who was tall, thin, and only forty.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.