Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 723 FSUPP2D 229 - NUSKEY v. Hochberg

NUSKEY v. Hochberg’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
January 2019
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 9 district ·

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 717 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)

Relies on Sprint/United Management Co. v. Mendelsohn · Ansell v. Green Acres Contracting Co. · 544 F. Supp. 2d 1 - Elion v. Jackson · Parker v. Secretary, U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development · Howard v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PUBLIC SCHOOLS

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) whether past discriminatory or retaliatory behavior is close in time to the events at issue in the case, (2) whether the same decisionmaker was involved, (3) whether the witness and plaintiff were treated in the same manner, and (4) whether the witness and plaintiff were otherwise similarly situated.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.