Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 723 P.2d 394 - Allen v. Kingdon

Allen v. Kingdon’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
2
states following
August 2021
most recently cited

1 district · 11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently August 2021

1 district · 11 state decisions

5019861990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Perkins v. Spencer · Golden Key Realty, Inc. v. Mantas · Waller v. Lieberman · Soffe v. Ridd · Bamberger Co. v. Certified Productions, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'the amount of liquidated damages bears no reasonable relationship to the actual damage or is so grossly excessive as to be entirely disproportionate to any possible loss that might have been contemplated that it shocks the conscience'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “where a party has changed position by performing an oral modification so that it would be inequitable to permit the other party to found a claim or defense on the original agreement as unmodified,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[t]he rule is well settled in Utah that if the original agreement is within the statute of frauds, a subsequent agreement that modifies any of the material parts of the original must also satisfy the statute.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.