Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 723 So. 2d 105 - Snell v. State

723 So. 2d 105 - Snell v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
March 2018
most recently cited

19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently March 2018

19 state decisions

80199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Gideon v. Wainwright · North Carolina v. Pearce · Wheat v. United States · Morris v. Slappy · Ex parte Lange

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'The decision to substitute or to remove court-appointed counsel and to appoint new counsel for an accused rests within the sound discretion of the trial court. Boldin v. State , 585 So.2d 218 (Ala. Cr. App. 1991) ; Cox v. State , 489 So.2d 612 (Ala. Cr. App. 1985). In order to prevail on a motion for substitution of counsel, the accused must show a demonstrated conflict of interest or the existence of an irreconcilable conflict so great that it has resulted in a total lack of communication that will prevent the preparation of an adequate defense . Boldin v. State ; Cox v. State .'”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.