723 So. 2d 1066 - State v. Parker’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
March 2014
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 649 So. 2d 1078 - State v. Smith · 641 So. 2d 1081 - State v. Jackson · 680 So. 2d 1237 - State v. Sneed · State v. Pitts · 684 So. 2d 567 - State v. Purvis
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Because the exact provisions of the Lafitte Housing Development trespassing rule were never established in the record by way of testimony or otherwise, we cannot determine whether or not this rule was violated, or even that there is such a rule.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“prohibiting a person from being in the Lafitte Housing Development without permission from a resident. In Parker this”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“that the mere fact that the defendant was in a housing development did not give rise to the officers reasonable suspicion that he was committing or was about to commit a crime when the stop was initiated.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.