Edwards v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
July 2008
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Hernandez v. New York · Powers v. Ohio · 667 So. 2d 1242 - Ballenger v. State · 517 So. 2d 1346 - Lockett v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“relevant evidence may be excluded if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or misleading the jury ...”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[t]his Court is confined by the record of a case and will not consider any matters that do not appear within it.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“that the State has a `legitimate interest in telling a rational and coherent story of what happened....'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Steed v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.