Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 723 SO2D 14 - Mitchell v. State

Mitchell v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
April 2016
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Ex Parte Davis · 527 So. 2d 1347 - Ex Parte Locke · City of Fort Payne v. Bouldin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Rule 20.1(a), Ala. R.Crim. P., requires that a motion for a judgment of acquittal be granted as to any offense ‘for which the evidence is insufficient to support a finding of guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.’ One commentator explains: ‘There must be substantial evidence tending to prove all the elements of the charge, and the burden is on the State to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the crime has been committed and that the defendant was the person who committed it.’ H. Maddox, Alabama Rules of Criminal Procedure § 20.1, at 734 (2d ed. 1994).””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.