TERMINIX INTERN. CO. v. Jackson’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos., Inc. v. Dobson · McNamara v. County of San Diego Department of Social Services · Oneida Motor Freight, Inc. v. United Jersey · Oneida Motor Freight, Inc. v. United Jersey Bank · Garlotte v. Fordice
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"We do note that the termite protection bond provides certain remedies to the Jacksons if new termite infestations occur, whereas the allegations of Counts I and II pertain to an inspection of the house for the sake of issuing a `termite letter' to facilitate the Jacksons' purchase of the house. This is virtually the same situation that was presented in Allied-Bruce Terminix [Cos.] v. Dobson [, 684 So.2d 102 (Ala. 1995)]. . . . As in Dobson , we do not see that the activities in regard to the termite letter give rise to claims `arising out of or relating to the interpretation, performance or breach of any provision of' the termite protection plan."”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ex Parte Morris“The Purchaser and Terminix agree that any controversy or claim between them arising out of or relating to the interpretation, performance or breach of any provision of this agreement shall be settled exclusively by arbitration.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ex Parte Morris
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.