Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 723 SO2D 696 - Janezic v. State

Janezic v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
February 2003
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 17

Relies on Illinois v. Gates · Irvin v. Dowd · Pate v. Robinson · Yick Wo v. Hopkins · Addington v. Texas

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If the motive arose at a time when the defendant was severely mentally ill, as in this case, then reasonably the motive evidence can have no probative value as tending to show that the defendant was sane at the time of her act pursuant to that motive (i.e., that she was able to appreciate the wrongfulness of her act).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “This court has today raised the standard of review in insanity cases to a height that no defendant can possibly reach. The undeniable effect of the majority's decision is that a jury's rejection of the insanity defense is no longer reviewable in Alabama.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “The evidence supports only one logical conclusion: her actions sprung from an insane mind. Moreover, all intentional murders have planning, whether it be merely picking up a knife or buying a gun.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.