Marshall v. State

Anthony MARSHALL, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 13, 1999.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1999-01-13

Relies on State v. Boyd · 708 So. 2d 315 - Thompson v. State · 695 So. 2d 872 - Caison v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1999-01-13

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently October 2018

9 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Anthony Marshall, in proper person.

¶2Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, for appellee.

¶3Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and GODERICH and FLETCHER, JJ.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5That portion of the order below denying Rule 3.850 relief which upholds the constitutionality of the "Gort Act" is affirmed on the authority of Spann v. State,719 So.2d 1031 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998); Elliard v. State,714 So.2d 1218 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998); Holloway v. State,712 So.2d 439 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998), and *924Higgs v. State,695 So.2d 872 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997). Contra Thompson v. State,708 So.2d 315 (Fla. 2d DCA), review granted, 717 So.2d 538 (Fla.1998). None of the other issues raised by the defendant merit reversal or discussion.

¶6Affirmed.