Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

723 So. 2d 952

State v. Ayche

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided January 15, 1999

Supreme Court of Louisiana · decided 1999-01-15

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently March 2008

3 state decisions

Relies on Strickland v. Washington

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1999-01-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM: *

¶1Writ granted in part; otherwise denied; case remanded to the district court. Given that the only evidence introduced by relator at trial addressed the legality of his investigatory stop, the district court is ordered to appoint counsel for relator for purposes of conducting an evidentiary hearing at which it will determine whether trial counsel’s failure to pursue relator’s motion to suppress constituted ineffective assistance of counsel under the standard set out in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). Relator may again appeal from any adverse ruling on his claim in the district court. In all other respects, the application is denied.

VICTORY, TRAYLOR and KNOLL, JJ., would deny the writ.

¶2 MARCUS, J., not on panel. See La.S.Ct. Rule IV, Part II, Sec. 3.

/723/so2d/952 · .json · Public domain