Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 723 SW2D 727 - Freeman v. State

Freeman v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

45
cited by 45 later decisions
2
states following
October 2002
most recently cited

45 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently October 2002 · most notably Long v. State (1991), Chambers v. State (1993)

45 state decisions

400198619902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Edwards v. Arizona · Brewer v. Williams · Oregon v. Bradshaw · Hardesty v. State · McMahon v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “An incriminating statement is rendered inadmissible if it is induced by promises that are: (1) positive; (2) made or sanctioned by someone in authority; (3) of some benefit to the accused; and (4) of such character as would be likely to influence the accused to speak untruthfully-”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.