Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 724 F.2d 1357 - Salmeron v. United States

Salmeron v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

724 F.2d 1357 · 1983

Citation profile

116
cited by 116 later decisions
2
states following
March 2018
most recently cited

70 federal appellate · 6 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 116 later decisions — most recently March 2018 · most notably Max Lopez Jr v. Ga Smith Larry Loo a Acevedo Patterson 4a-2r (2000), Wb Ej Ej v. Matula

70 federal appellate · 6 district · 3 state decisions

6001983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3481 · 28 U.S.C. § 2671

Relies on Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Merrion v. Jicarilla Apache Tribe · Thompson v. Maxwell Landgrant Railway Co · United States v. Conforte · Maynard v. Durham and Southern Railway Company

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 116 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a court must independently investigate and evaluate any compromise or settlement of a minor's claims to assure itself that the minor's interests are protected, even if the settlement has been recommended or negotiated by the minor's parent or guardian ad litem”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[a] release of claims for violations of civil and constitutional rights must be voluntary, deliberate, and informed”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “although legal representation is an important factor in assessing the voluntariness of a release of federal rights, it is not dispositive * * *. [Plaintiff's] execution of the release might have been coerced, even though [plaintiff's] counsel advised him to sign it.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.