Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 724 F.2d 1421 - McCowen v. Jamieson

McCowen v. Jamieson’s Empirical Analysis

724 F.2d 1421 · 1984

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
3
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 4 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently June 2019 · most notably Mastercard International Inc. v. Visa International Service Ass'n (2006), No. 84-5811 (1985)

6 federal appellate · 4 district · 3 state decisions

901984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Provident Tradesmens Bank & Trust Co. v. Patterson · Federal Communications Commission v. Schreiber · Boles v. Greeneville Housing Authority · In re Hergenroeder

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “is sufficiently important that it can be raised at any stage of the proceedings — even sua sponte.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “we must presume that FNS has been afforded notice and an opportunity to participate. Neither it nor the United States nor any federal official is knocking at the door. Under these circumstances, I see no reason for us to require the trial court to open the door to go out and look for federal agencies or officials and invite them in.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “necessarily constrains the future options of the secretary,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.