Pryor v. Rose’s Empirical Analysis
724 F.2d 525 · 1984
Citation profile
24 federal appellate · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently October 2014 · most notably State v. DeLuca (1987), State v. Wiley (1985)
24 federal appellate · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Blockburger v. United States · North Carolina v. Pearce · Brown v. Ohio · Sumner v. Mata · Missouri v. Hunter
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“wholly unacceptable under Whalen, which requires that the legislature 'clearly indicate' that consecutive sentences are permissible for offenses which are the same under the Blockburger test.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Banner v. Davis“We therefore hold that the Tennessee legislature has not clearly indicated that consecutive sentences are proper in the situation presented by this case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Banner v. Davis“whether each provision requires proof of a fact which the other does not.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.