United States v. Anderson’s Empirical Analysis
724 F.2d 596 · 1984
Citation profile
31 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 44 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2006 · most notably United States Department of Justice v. Julian (1988), United States v. Canino (1991)
31 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2113
Relies on United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co. · McClain v. United States · House v. Stynchcombe · Stern v. United States Gypsum, Inc. · Elam v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]ny broader disclosure requirement ... would upset the delicate balance underlying Rule 32(c)(3). Confidentiality of presentence reports is vitally important to the efficacy of the sentencing process.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“a presentence report should not be disclosed to third parties unless lifting confidentiality is required to meet ends of justice”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“portions of the report that contain the impeaching material”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.