Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 724 F.2d 696 - Crocker National Bank Credit Alliance Corporation v. Clark Equipment Credit Corporation Litton Industries Credit Corporation

Crocker National Bank Credit Alliance Corporation v. Clark Equipment Credit Corporation Litton Industries Credit Corporation’s Empirical Analysis

724 F.2d 696 · 1984

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
January 2003
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently January 2003

6 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

60198419902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bishop v. Wood · De Leon v. United States · Luke v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. · Red Lobster Inns of America, Inc. v. Lawyers Title Insurance · In the Matter of Augustin Bros. Co., Debtor. Wright Grain Company v. Augustin Bros. Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(e) If a sale of goods results in an account or chattel paper which is transferred by the seller to a secured party, and if the goods are returned to or repossessed by the seller or the secured party, the following rules determine priorities: (1) If the goods were collateral at the time of sale for an indebtedness of the seller which is still unpaid, the original security interest attaches again to the goods and continues as a perfected security interest if it was perfected at the time when the goods were sold.... (2) An unpaid transferee of chattel paper has a security interest in the goods .... prior to a security interest asserted under Subdivision (1) to the extent that the transferee of the chattel paper was entitled to priority under Section 9.308.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “As author of this opinion, I dissent....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.