Bingham, Ltd. v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
724 F.2d 921 · 1984
Citation profile
24 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 75 later decisions — most recently April 2019 · most notably Finisar Corp. v. Directv Group, Inc. (2008), United States v. Pruitt (1985)
24 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 841 (Amendments of 1973 to Federal Law) · 18 U.S.C. § 842 · 18 U.S.C. § 844 · 18 U.S.C. § 845 · 18 U.S.C. § 847 · 18 U.S.C. § 921 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Relies on United States v. Diebold, Inc. · United States v. Bass · Mourning v. Family Publications Service, Inc. · Busic v. United States · Weinberger v. Hynson, Westcott & Dunning, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 75 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Where the modifier is set off from two or more antecedents by a comma, ... the comma indicates the drafter's intent that the modifier relate to more than the last antecedent.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“modifier is set off from two or more antecedents by a comma, ... the modifier relate[s] to more than the last antecedent”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.