United States v. Batchu’s Empirical Analysis
724 F.3d 1 · 2013
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2256 · 18 U.S.C. § 2422 (White-Slave Traffic Act of 1910 (Mann Act)) · 18 U.S.C. § 2423 (White-Slave Traffic Act of 1910 (Mann Act)) · 18 U.S.C. § 3553
Relies on United States v. Olano · United States v. Dunnigan · Jones v. United States · United States v. Duarte · United States v. Antonakopoulos
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“suggests that we should similarly not require the government to provide an expert witness for an assessment frequently and routinely made in day-to-day experience.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“must adduce fairly powerful mitigating reasons and persuade [this Court] that the district judge was unreasonable in balancing pros and cons.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“even in assessing the more technical subject of whether a sexually explicit image depicts a real or computer-generated child,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.