Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 724 F.3d 1191 - George v. Morris

George v. Morris’s Empirical Analysis

724 F.3d 1191 · 2013

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
July 2013
most recently cited

1 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1988

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · Graham v. Connor

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “All circuits that have considered whether the collateral order doctrine confers appellate jurisdiction over appeals arising from a grant of partial summary judgment based on qualified immunity have universally held that such a judgment is not immediately appealable.” Id. (collecting cases). Pendent appellate jurisdiction might be exercised over non-reviewable interlocutory decisions that raise issues”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “address[] the jurisdictional defect that ... [fact-related] issues potentially raise under Johnson.” Conatser v. N. Las Vegas Police Dep’t, 445 Fed.Appx. 932 , 933 (9th Cir.2011) (per curiam) (a panel including Judge Tashima dismissed for lack of appellate jurisdiction officer-defendants’ claim that”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “that resolution of the federal constitutional claims would necessarily dictate the resolution of the state law'claims,” we do not address them . separately. ' 6 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.