Jacobs v. Vrobel’s Empirical Analysis
724 F.3d 217 · 2013
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 10 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2679
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Osborn v. Haley · American National Insurance v. Federal Deposit Insurance · Wilson v. Libby
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(a) it is of the kind he is employed to perform; (b) it occurs substantially within the authorized time and space limits; (c) it is actuated, at least in part, by a purpose to serve the master; and (d) if force is intentionally used by the servant against another, the use of force is not unexpectable by the master.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The Attorney General's certification constitutes prima facie evidence that the employee was acting within the scope of his employment, and once the certification has been made, the plaintiff challenging the certification has the burden of "alleging facts that, if true, would establish that the defendants were acting outside the scope of their employment."”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“sufficient facts that, taken as true, would establish that the defendants' actions exceeded the scope of their employment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Harris v. Wilson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.