Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 724 F.3d 999 - Pactiv Corp. v. Rupert

Pactiv Corp. v. Rupert’s Empirical Analysis

724 F.3d 999 · 2013

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
March 2019
most recently cited

4 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 1102 (§ 402 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974)

Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Fort Halifax Packing Co. v. Coyne · Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. Schoonejongen · Donovan v. Dillingham · Bartholet v. REISHAUER A.G.

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.